April 10, 2008
Want to Sell Your Home? Raise the Price!
That’s apparently the strategy for the property at 2805 Rinconia Avenue, Los Angeles, near the Hollywood Reservoir.
This three-bedroom, two-bath home, with 2,029 square feet, was purchased in December 2006 for $800,000. Four days ago, it came on the market for $1,599,000, which, if sold for that price, would represent 100 percent appreciation in a little more than a year — in one of the most down markets in memory. 
But wait, it gets better! Today, the listing was updated with a new price: $1,699,000!
Um…what am I missing here? The listing description says “This house has history!” but so what? Lots of houses have history. It also states: “Recently sold properties in area and on same street have sold for more $ sq foot (1.525M).”
The “properties” in question appear to be exactly ONE property, at 2514 Rinconia Drive. For some reason, this 4+2 with 1,782 square feet, bought in April 2007 for $895,000, sold in December for $1,525,000. How can this be?
And that sale appears to be an aberration. Here are other recent sales in the area:
2431 San Marco Drive, Los Angeles
Sold for: $932,271 on 1/30/08 (bank-owned?)
3BR/3B/2,255 square feet
2305 Vasanta Way, Los Angeles
Sold for: $1,000,000 on 12/04/07
3BR/3B/2,547 square feet
Notes: This is a very weird sales history: Sold for $721,000 in August 2004; in May 2006 for $2,000,000; and in March 2007 for $1,381,527 (the unrounded numbers are a sure sign of a bank sale).
If anyone in the area has any thoughts about this neighborhood and these wacky prices, please post!

Corntrollio said:
If you have to try to justify your price that poorly, the price is probably too high. And of course, the agent didn’t even put how many square feet the house is so that one could compare.
April 10, 2008 10:50 AM
Cindy Allen said:
Well, that’s our friends at CLAW MLS again,refusing to give out square footage. I agree, Corntrollio: It’s just weird. I predict no sale.
April 10, 2008 11:13 AM